Are Single Family Homes Exempt From AB 1482

Have you ever wondered about the nuances of California's rent control laws, especially in the context of single-family homes? The introduction of Assembly Bill 1482, or AB 1482, stirred quite a discussion among homeowners, renters, and investors alike. But here's the million-dollar question: Are single-family homes exempt from the provisions of AB 1482? It's a topic that's not just legal jargon but affects real lives and real homes. So, let's unpack this together and see what AB 1482 really means for single-family homeowners and tenants.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Single-Family Home Exemption: Single-family homes are generally exempt from AB 1482, but only if not owned by a corporation or similar entity and the exemption is clearly communicated to tenants.
  • Local Rent Control Laws Supersede: In areas with existing rent control laws, those take precedence over AB 1482, particularly for older buildings.
  • Just Cause Eviction Protections: AB 1482 introduces stringent just cause requirements for evictions, enhancing tenant security.
  • New Construction Exemption: Buildings constructed in the last 15 years are exempt from AB 1482, encouraging new housing developments.
  • Vacancy Decontrol Provision: Landlords can reset rents to market rates on vacant units, but subsequent increases are subject to AB 1482 limits.

What The Research Says

  • According to insights from Greenberg Traurig LLP and the California Apartment Association, AB 1482, known as the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, brought significant changes to California’s rental market. This state law, effective from January 1, 2020, primarily does two things: it requires landlords to have a “just cause” for terminating tenancies and limits annual rent increases to no more than 5% plus the local Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 10%, whichever is lower.
  • Now, regarding single-family homes, they are only exempt from AB 1482 under two specific conditions: First, the property must not be owned by a corporation, a real estate investment trust, or an LLC with at least one corporate member. Second, the landlord must notify the tenant in writing that the tenancy is not subject to the “just cause” and rent increase limitations of AB 1482. This notice needs to be included in the rental agreement for tenancies that started or were renewed after July 1, 2020. If these conditions are not met, then even single-family homes fall under the ambit of AB 1482. This exemption also doesn't apply where there is more than one dwelling unit on the same lot or any second residential unit in the building that cannot be sold separately from the subject unit.

Understanding AB 1482's Scope and Limitations

Let's start by exploring the wider context of AB 1482. This law, which took effect on January 1, 2020, aims to offer greater stability to tenants in a state known for its dynamic rental market. It limits annual rent increases to 5% plus local inflation, not exceeding 10%, and requires landlords to provide "just cause" for tenant evictions. Crucially, these rules apply retroactively from March 15, 2019, meaning the rent amount paid on this date is the base for any future increases. This law is a game-changer for many, but it's not without its complexities and exceptions.

The Single-Family Home Exemption

When it comes to single-family homes, the exemption under AB 1482 is not as straightforward as it may appear. These homes are exempt only if they're not owned by a corporation, real estate investment trust, or an LLC with a corporate member. Additionally, tenants must be notified of this exemption in their rental agreements. Failing to meet these conditions brings single-family homes under AB 1482's purview. This requirement for transparency ensures tenants are well-informed about their rights and the regulations governing their tenancy.

The Impact of Local Rent Control Laws

The interplay between AB 1482 and local rent control laws adds another layer of complexity. AB 1482 does not supersede local rent control ordinances. In cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco, where local rent control laws apply to buildings constructed before a certain date, AB 1482 fills the gap, covering newer buildings that local laws don't. For example, in Los Angeles, buildings constructed after October 1978 fall under AB 1482, while older buildings adhere to the city's rent control laws.

The Just Cause Eviction Clause

Another vital aspect of AB 1482 is its just cause requirement for evictions. Landlords can no longer evict tenants without a valid reason. This protection kicks in after a tenant has lived in the unit for at least one year, or if one of the tenants has occupied the unit for 24 months or more. Just cause reasons are categorized as either "at-fault" (like failure to pay rent or criminal activity) or "no-fault" (such as the owner intending to occupy the property). This provision significantly changes the landscape of tenant eviction, offering more stability and predictability.

INVESTING COUNCIL DIGEST

Get access to the latest investing and money tips delivered to you monthly.

By clicking "Subscribe", you accept our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. You can opt-out at any time.

Navigating New Construction Exemptions

It's also important to note that AB 1482 doesn't apply to buildings constructed within the last 15 years. This rolling date means that each year, buildings constructed 15 years prior come under AB 1482. For instance, a building constructed in 2006 would be covered starting in 2021. This exemption aims to encourage new construction and development, recognizing that a healthy rental market needs a constant influx of new housing stock.

The Vacancy Decontrol Provision

AB 1482 also includes a vacancy decontrol provision, meaning landlords can reset rents to market rates when a unit becomes vacant. However, once a new tenant moves in, the rent increase limitations of AB 1482 kick back in. This provision offers a balance, allowing landlords to align with market rates while protecting existing tenants from steep rent hikes.

The Interplay of Just Cause Evictions and Local Laws

Just cause eviction rules under AB 1482 complement local ordinances that may already impose similar requirements. For cities with their own just cause eviction laws, those local laws take precedence if they are more protective than the state law. This approach ensures that tenants in cities with strong tenant protections continue to enjoy those rights without being undercut by the state law.

The Bottom Line

  • As we wrap up, it's clear that AB 1482 represents a significant shift in California's rental landscape, particularly regarding single-family homes. The key takeaway is that these homes are generally exempt from AB 1482, but only if they meet specific ownership and notification requirements. This nuanced approach aims to balance tenant protections with the interests of property owners. The law's intricacies, from the just cause eviction requirements to the exemptions for new constructions and the interplay with local rent control laws, all contribute to a more regulated and, arguably, fairer rental market in California. However, it's essential for both landlords and tenants to stay informed and understand how these rules apply to their specific circumstances.

Improve your credit score with our free blueprint, your path to financial success!

Follow our checklist for an easy home-buying journey!

A free guide comparing stocks and real estate investment!

Build, repair and boost your credit score with this comprehensive course

Discover other resources and insights to amplify your earnings, savings, and financial growth

Discover other resources and insights to amplify your earnings, savings, and financial growth

We're dedicated to making tough financial topics easy, ensuring you can confidently oversee all your investing and financial choices.

© Copyright | Investing Council | All Rights Reserved


By accessing or using this Website and our Services, you agree to be bound by our Terms & Conditions. No parts of this website may be copied, reproduced, or published without explicit written permission of the website owner. All product and company names or logos are trademarks™ or registered® trademarks of their respective holders. The views expressed within this site and all associated pages are those of our own, or of a contributor to this site, and are not of the companies mentioned. While we do our best to keep these updated, numbers stated on this site may differ from actual numbers. All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation. Investment and insurance products aren't insured by the FDIC or any federal agency, aren't bank-guaranteed deposits, and carry the risk of potential principal loss.